Voice Picture

Voice Picture

 

 

Well this is a visual representation of my voice. I actually made it a representation of it over the course of the semester so far. This drawing represents the large journey my voice has undergone during the first half of the semester.

Starting with the shape of the paper, the conic shape represents how I’m being to find more volume with my voice. It’s increasing, just as the paper’s size increases a little bit from left to right. The asymmetric shape is meant to show the inconsistencies of my voice. I understand that many days I find great moments and great vowel sounds in my speech and I use it effectively, but then the next day I end up back at square one.

The lines drawn on the paper have meaning in their shape, color, and direction. Starting with shape, the more jagged a line is, the less standardized my speech is. In the beginning of the year, most of my vowel sounds were not anywhere near standard American. I had some of them down in my everyday speech, but most of them were incorrect. As the year continues, you can see the lines straightening themselves out, as they are slowly getting closer to standard American speech. Some lines still have some jagged beginnings or are curved ever-so-slightly to show how I’m still not perfect with my vowel placement. Finally, when we get to the end of the paper, my lines start swirling. This is meant to show how I started manipulating these mostly standardized vowels (these straight lines) into something more exciting (swirls).

The colors of the lines show my comfort with the vowel sounds. In the beginning of the year, my vowel sounds had to be forced. They were manufactured, so they were grey, like the color of smoke released from a factory. Soon they became blue with hints of grey, representing how they were still rather forced, but they were a little bit easier to make. Even then, however, the colors are still all only shades of blue. There is no variety, just as I felt as though every vowel sound as I was making was unoriginal and still lifeless. As the paper reaches the end and the semester reaches its midpoint, I find these vowel sounds easier to make and more fun to create, hence the myriad of colors near the end. They begin to become fun to use rather than a chore to form.

The direction of the lines show my certainty with what direction the class was taking. At the beginning of the year, I had was a little uncertain as to how this was all going to be covered and if I would be able to do it all, hence some lines being askew or vertical. Clearly I got the idea, as the lines straightened out rather quickly. Also representing this uncertainty, specifically in my ability to properly form these speech sounds, is a slight black shading in the background. The black shading lightens as the semester continues.

Lastly, the edge of the paper is covered in the tails of many colorful lines. It represents how, even though I don’t know what the rest of the semester will be like, I’m confident that the speech work we did in the first of the semester will carry over and be the basis for what work will be done.

NPR Synthetic Voice Story

I’m not exactly sure how I feel about this story. I sympathize with Samantha’s story, as it must have been hard for her to not even have her own voice throughout her entire life. It’s heartbreaking to think that such a unique factor of all human beings is not available to her. And, frankly, I find the technology that Rupal Patel to be amazing. To be able to take a simple sound sample and form it into a unique synthetic voice is astonishing. It must be very difficult to manipulate that sound sample to form the sounds you want it to form, especially if we have our voices and are having some difficulty properly forming vowels in class. Yet this technology unsettles me a little, to be honest. It’s weird and disconcerting to think that we are coming to the point where we can make individual voices. Eventually we’ll be able to make them so well they could very well become commonplace and then so convincing we may not be able to tell the difference between organic and synthetic voices. I know it sounds like science-fiction mumbo-jumbo to think people would start using synthetic voices in place of organic voices in everyday life, but it’s worrying to me, as we’d soon lose the amazing things that are unique to real human voices. We would lose what makes our voices special. I feel like that’s something that the people who used Perfect Paul must have felt. The story really just made me feel how important it is, even though we are standardizing our speech in class, that we keep our voices our own, that our speech techniques are really only used to better our voice and make our individual voices more effective rather than replace them with some standard, blanket actor/actress voice. This is actually really going to affect the way I look at our speech exercises, as before this I was looking to reach some universal speech voice used by all actors. Now I’m hoping to stay away from that. Samantha wanted an individualized voice, her voice, so I shouldn’t give mine up.

Diane Wiest (Is there a Diane East to match?)

I’ve never heard of Diane Wiest until watching this video. In terms of her speech and sound-making, I found that the clarity in her voice gave her the apathetic facade that was discussed in the clip. It seemed to create an image of neutrality which I think serves her especially well when playing a therapist. It also is sort of unsettling to me, to be completely honest. It might be because it seems so utterly neutral. Either way, I felt a little uncomfortable until near the end, yet even then her speech was practically perfect.

“Are You Listening to Me, Bob?” “Uh-Huh.” “My Eyes Are Up Here, Bob…”

DISCLAIMER: I have not had the experience of a man staring at my chest rather than my eyes while I speak to him, but I still find the title of this post applicable…

I often don’t feel heard. It’s not a huge issue. I don’t throw tantrums (anymore) and have resigned to accept it. I suppose, honestly, that I cause it myself. I rarely speak up in large social settings, so I suppose that people have come to expect it of me to be quiet. Therefore, when I do speak up, I don’t think people listen because I tend to fade into the background in these situations. On the other hand, though, I like to think I almost always listen. Since I’m not talking, I have nothing to do but to listen. I am often the person people talk to about problems with people close to them because they know I’ll listen and not give them any feedback or criticisms on their predicament nor will I go and tell the world about their problems. When I’m listening, when I’m really listening, I feel an immense focus overcome my body. I practically tune out all other sounds. My gaze remains on the speaker, establishing a connection with them so that they never have to question whether or not I’m actually listening to them.

When I feel heard, it is almost always when I’m with only a maximum of three other people. Any larger than that and I get lost in the crowd. When I’m with a small group of people, I find myself just generally more comfortable, and I honestly don’t need that many cues to know someone is listening to me. Focused eye-contact is about all I need for me to recognize that the person is listening to me (so I suppose I’m about as mature as a four-year-old boy in that sense). The idea is that if they are able to keep focused on my eyes, the mind shouldn’t be wandering anywhere else, meaning they are listening to me rather than concerning themselves with something else.

Voices (First Blog Assignment for Drama 14)

I have always been sensitive to accents, specifically the way people say certain words. I grew up with my grandmother switching any word that ended in an “a” with an “er”. The Master of Disguise was my favorite movie as a child because I would just imitate the numerous disguises of Dana Carvey. From Indian prince to “The Turtle Man” to secret agent Terry Suave (involved with Operation Minty Hippo), I would love to hear the different ways the voice could be manipulated to appear as a completely different person. Luckily there are not any words I hate to hear (yet). People often find themselves disturbed at words such as “moist”, but I have no problem with them. I do love words that have multiple vowel sounds, “rutabaga”, for instance. Also words with strong “f” sounds that give a punch are always a great pleasure. “Befuddle”, “filch”, and (to make a quick The Lion King reference) “Mufasa” are great fun! I do realize I do cringe at terribly high-pitched, squeaky voices, and of course, screams, specifically those of small children, make me want to punch a wall. They do get to me. There are also a few voices, the low, reverberating voices of some men (such as Morgan Freeman), that will send chills down my spine just because they are so calm and cool. My sensitivity to the ways people speak, especially to how they form words, has skyrocketed since I have started training my speech. I think just knowing what to listen for has opened up my ears to all of the little differences and quirks in our speech. Lastly, and whether or not this counts as speech (I doubt it does) I know not, I hate the sound of chewing. If I can hear you chew (you probably have your mouth open while you eat), I will cringe and want to tear my hair out. I doubt it is considered a speech quality, but perhaps it can be related to how we breathe.

HOWDY!

Well, I’ve essentially never posted here except for the one assignment for my Journalism class from a whole year ago, so here is a post! It’s still technically for a class, but why not, right? This is a reading of Edmund from Eugene O’Neill’s Long Day’s Journey Into Night. It was without terribly much preparation, but I will continue to work on this throughout the year. Also, it was fun to yell at my iPhone in my residence hall’s study room!

 

Oh…..well apparently WordPress doesn’t allow me to upload .mp3 files without paying exuberant amounts of money, so…..no recording! Unfortunate, I know, but I still love you guys!

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. After you read this, you should delete and write your own post, with a new title above. Or hit Add New on the left (of the admin dashboard) to start a fresh post.

Here are some suggestions for your first post.

  1. You can find new ideas for what to blog about by reading the Daily Post.
  2. Add PressThis to your browser. It creates a new blog post for you about any interesting  page you read on the web.
  3. Make some changes to this page, and then hit preview on the right. You can always preview any post or edit it before you share it to the world.

News Values and How They Affect Story Content

On Thursday, February 2nd, 2012, both CNN and The New York Times posted on their respective websites stories covering the recent $250,000 matching grant from Mayor Bloomberg to Planned Parenthood. The organization took a major blow when the Susan G. Komen for the Cure foundation withdrew its funding, sapping about $700,000 that Planned Parenthood could have used for breast cancer screenings. When the two news sources covered this story, there seemed to be a distinct difference among the many similarities. Both stories covered the main facts of the controversy and Bloomberg’s donation, but CNN seemed to focus in a little more detail on the political aspect of the story, whereas The New York Times appeared to focus more on the plight of the organization rather than the politics behind it. This is demonstrative of the slight difference in news values between the two news sources. CNN seems to value the idea of political conflict. The New York Times, on the other hand, appears to value human interest and the emotional impact this story could have on people. This likely affected what was included in these stories. CNN’s article includes more quotes from various officials and organizations regarding the investigation of Planned Parenthood in terms of abortion laws and such, almost removing itself from the topic of Bloomberg’s donation altogether, pushing the article to focus more on the politics of the situation. The New York Times remains focused on Planned Parenthood and Bloomberg’s donation to the organization, giving it more of an emotional appeal. Both stories do, however, focus on the impact this news has on the health of many women around the country.